CLAIM
INTELLIGENCE
ENGINE

The fact-checker that checks the fact-checkers.

Transparent, symmetrical epistemic analysis of any claim or article. No political exceptions. No opaque verdicts.

Check a claim →How it works

"If our verdict manages to displease both the right and the left, we have probably found the truth."

— Founding principle, Factiator

Factiator AI Engine v2.2
Analyze a claim or article

How it works

01
Submit a claim or article
Type or paste a claim, a URL, or a full fact-check article from any source.
02
Engine applies the framework
The Factiator AI Engine v2.2 decomposes sub-claims, classifies sources, checks funding, evaluates counterpositions, and detects bias — in both directions.
03
Structured verdict
A full epistemic report: confidence scores, source tags, bias flags, counterposition, and a 5-component score breakdown. Length and detail according to your plan. No black boxes.
04
Share or export
Every report gets a permanent public URL. Export as PDF (Pro+), social media image card, or video clip.

The epistemic framework

Every analysis applies all six components. The methodology is published openly on GitHub.

[K:xx%]
Confidence scoring
Every claim receives a per-claim confidence estimate from 0–100%, grounded in actual evidence quality — not institutional prestige.
[PR/IN/GL/ME/NK]
Source classification
Every referenced source is tagged by type. Peer-reviewed is not the same as grey literature. This difference is visible.
[FI:IND/GOV/NGO]
Funding transparency
Applied symmetrically to all sources regardless of political direction. No exemptions.
[KON/MIN/POP/POL]
Consensus classification
Consensus is not truth. Minority is not false. Both are assessed on evidence quality, not on how many people hold the position.
6 bias types
Bias detection
Institutional, alternative, confirmation, manufactured doubt, appeal to authority, straw man — checked in both directions.
Mandatory
Counterposition coverage
The strongest counterargument is always required. Missing it is flagged as a structural deficiency.

Pricing

The epistemic standard is not for sale. Money buys volume and convenience — not deeper analysis.

Free
$0/month
  • 10 analyses/month
  • 1 video + image card/month
  • Verdict + summary output
  • Permanent public URL
  • Display ads shown
Start free
MOST POPULAR
Pro
$19/month
  • Higher analysis cap
  • More video + image card exports
  • No watermark
  • PDF export
  • No ads
Get Pro
Power
$49/month
  • Full analysis output
  • No ads
  • API access
  • Bulk submissions (daily limit applies)
  • CSV export
  • Early feature access
Get Power
Corporate
$199/month
  • Deep analysis + citations
  • Audit trail
  • Team seats
  • White-label (on request)
  • Dedicated support
Contact us
The definitive test

If the engine produces the same rigorous output for a convenient claim as it does for an uncomfortable one — the product has succeeded.

Symmetry is enforced in the architecture, not promised in a policy statement.