Claim Intelligence Engine
The fact-checker
that checks
the fact-checkers.
Transparent, symmetrical epistemic analysis of any claim or article. No political exceptions. No opaque verdicts.
"If I have managed to displease both the right and the left by what I have written, I have probably found the truth."
Factiator AI Engine v2.2
Analyze a claim or article
How it works
01
Submit a claim or article
Type or paste a claim, a URL, or a full fact-check article from any source.
02
Engine applies the framework
The Factiator AI Engine v2.2 decomposes sub-claims, classifies sources, checks funding, evaluates counterpositions, and detects bias — in both directions.
03
Structured verdict
A full epistemic report: confidence scores, source tags, bias flags, counterposition, and a 5-component score breakdown. No black boxes.
04
Share or export
Every report gets a permanent public URL. Export as PDF (Power+) or video clip for social media.
The epistemic framework
Every analysis applies all six components. The methodology is published openly on GitHub.
[K:xx%]
Confidence scoring
Every claim receives a per-claim confidence estimate from 0–100%, grounded in actual evidence quality — not institutional prestige.
[PR/IN/GL/ME/NK]
Source classification
Every referenced source is tagged by type. Peer-reviewed is not the same as grey literature. This difference is visible.
[FI:IND/GOV/NGO…]
Funding transparency
Applied symmetrically to all sources regardless of political direction. No exemptions.
[KON/MIN/POP/POL]
Consensus classification
Consensus ≠ truth. Minority ≠ false. Both are assessed on evidence quality, not on how many people hold the position.
6 bias types
Bias detection
Institutional, alternative, confirmation, manufactured doubt, appeal to authority, straw man — checked in both directions.
Mandatory
Counterposition coverage
The strongest counterargument is always required. Missing it is flagged as a structural deficiency.
Pricing
The epistemic standard is not for sale. Money buys volume and convenience — not deeper analysis.
Free
$0/month
- ✓ 10 analyses/month
- ✓ 1 video export/month
- ✓ Verdict + summary output
- ✓ Permanent public URL
- ✓ Display ads shown
MOST POPULAR
Pro
$19/month
- ✓ Higher analysis cap
- ✓ More video exports
- ✓ No watermark
- ✓ PDF export
- ✓ No ads
Power
$49/month
- ✓ Full analysis output
- ✓ API access
- ✓ Bulk submissions
- ✓ CSV export
- ✓ Early feature access
Corporate
$199/month
- ✓ Deep analysis + citations
- ✓ Audit trail
- ✓ Team seats
- ✓ White-label option
- ✓ SLA
The definitive test
If the tool is applied to an article or claim from an organization that funds us, or from a political direction we personally agree with — and it produces the same rigorous output as it would for any other source — the product has succeeded.
Symmetry is technically enforced in the engine and scoring logic — it is architecture, not aspiration.